Saving and Destroying the Planet as it is
printSaving and Destroying the Planet as it is
For saving the Planet, nothing relevant could have been done by humans in the past - obviously, a universal genius is required today.
For destroying the Planet, however, the only requirement was a terrible Elite, as it exists - and their masses as they still are.
This rule is fundamental. But to make understand this theorem, I must go into many more of details.
How and why saving the Earth?
Everybody can see it: The Earth is potentially a Paradise. We had it ready-made, in the past, this paradise:
Beautiful landscapes, lakes, woods, mountains, rivers, oceans, plants, animals, fishes. There were the waves of clear water and the breeze of winds for dreaming and a sun not behind a rotten curtain of poisoned geo-sphere.
But unfortunately, there were also Humans on this Globe-----
They certainly made some good things, those fine humans - like paintings, music, philosophies, literature, fine feelings, fine love, fine sex and fine works for all times.
But humans will become more famous in non-written history books, for destructing the paradise with science, technologies, money, progress, growth, mass of population explosion, destroying all nature, water, air, producing a holocaust of animals, wars and torture and terror for humans, nations to kill each other, greed, growth of self-destruction, exhaustion of all reserves in resources and energy in just 10 generations - and a human character that couldn't have been worse.
Humans were the enemies of themselves, of the Earth, of Life, of their Reality.
How under these conditions could this deadly CHAOS of dullness be saved?
Naturally by showing the facts and writing in books about solutions to come, in order the stop the craze of Hypes and Cash-philosophies of the worst kind, written by the most stupid vanity-heads in all times.
Why destroying the World?
First of all, the World destroys itself, by human nature. Humans had no reason for destroying their own World, except for their feelings for greed, growth, wanting to have all - and others having nothing, due to blindness in all philosophies and theories in economics.
Therefore it needed a universal genius to see all these facts and describe it for all future generations - going over in lines, were any solutions would come too late by far. But at least, it would have been possible, the chance on a better planet, by reversing the scenery in growth, explosion of masses of humans, protecting nature, water, air and landscapes and oceans and all the rest.
However, such a sort of thinking was always an illusion and nothing else would demonstrate the case better than the history of a universal genius.
What could a universal genius do and how could it react?
It is easy to say: Such a universal genius would not find one little chance, because it must have been so, that all his manuscripts would be rejected by all Editors in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. This was a bank. And it was also sure that the finally printed books on own cost would be ignored by all Feuilletons for Press, Radio and TV in Switzerland, Germany and Austria.
It was absolutely sure, those idiots will never publish any article of such a universal genius, because their empty brains could not see emergency and correctness of thoughts.
And so any idea of "Saving the world" was stopped from the start. It became impossible, unless the text would appear in a new Medium, like the Internet, and - very funny indeed - in another language than German - in English.
What was needed to get the energy for writing?
Well, most writers in literature and philosophy write because they want to stay in the memory of humanity. Or they think they have a marvellous talent to be used. Or they had just one good idea and the only way to keep it, was writing a story or a book.
All this is valid for the universal genius as well. But here comes one thing in addition: Here it was clear from the start, from Youth, that not one other human would understand, in what final stage this planet would be in Philosophy, Religion, Ecology, Economics and Culture.
Naming the big Errors of human mankind:
In Philosophy, all philosophers had written scrap in view of the final results at the End of times. Their making heroes out of normal humans, ready to kill anybody by nations crimes, was a crime in itself, a crime of philosophy. The idea of putting anything in favour of "Human Behaviourism" was from the start not philosophy, but pure stupidity. The missing lines in understanding that the planet itself would dictate the limits of feasibility, growth, greed, human stupidity, was not given to one simple philosophers of the last 3000 years.
In Economics, all theorists of the last 300 years were completely nuts. Their ways of taking money as a measure for maximizing profits on basis of greed, growth, more and more of consumerism, of production, of using up all resources and energy stuffs of the planet, transformed into poison, was incredibly stupid and had to lead to the Crash of stock exchanges, banks, systems, capitalism, neo-liberalism and all the rest. There had never been any other way out of this wanted and planned impasse.
In Religion, the idiots knowing "God" in Rome, Mecca, Delhi, Tibet, Beijing, London, Texas, Tokyo and any other places in the world, was just one big bluff. No person ever in this world could give a reasonable analysis what GOD could be, but in his name and by his will, all others were destroyed, killed and tortured, women stoned and burnt alive on wood piles, children and youth killed in torture cellars, for the belief in capitalism or communisms, being some other religions, and by the end, the whole thing will be blown up by the masses - be they believing too much in their one-and-only Gods, or leaving him aside for all times.
In Ecology, the worst of all sceneries could happen, the self-destruction of humans by the destruction of their own platform of living, not seen due to the slowness of procedures and by the fact, the downfall and breakdown of life-systems would only become evident, when the most stupid sciences of humans would have "proven" that the planet is in it's free fall. All the protocols of Kyoto and Copenhagen were just one bluff, because it was not understood that one universal genius could possess more brains that one million of stupid scientists. Our Elite never was able to explain mass-laws and the rules of the great figures, in their one-way street of Being, crashing in a Wall (Sackgassen des Seienden).
- Chinese exploding bubbles were admired - Real intellect never.
In Culture, it could well be said that humans never had any culture. In matters like paintings or music, this would not hurt and those arts would add to the well-feeling of our own Species of Homo non-sapiens. But for Literature, one great book would stand for ALL great books. All human feelings and principles were already written in the first book of importance. For philosophy and religion, I explained myself above these lines. Where greed and growth and vanity are the only measures of success, anything in culture was just a Proof for what former generations did - in arts or in junk. Not more - not less. The rest was self-admiration of idiots. The Proof: Never the great works were recognized by living folks. Always the patina of times was needed, to make out of shit some pure gold to be paid millions of Dollars for it.
Why starting with the Finance Place of Switzerland?
I don't know exactly what is required to write 20000 hours for nothing. Perhaps the feeling, that time went out of my own life and all the lives of all humans that ever existed. Perhaps, the knowledge to be in possession of an outstanding talent. Perhaps just the pleasure in writing, to see those lines "happen" on the computer or laptop. It gives a feeling of superiority over those, who have no brains.
But perhaps the early death of my brother after about 20 years of life, and this showed me that times on Earth are limited, and talents are nothing, of not lived out in writing of books.
But the major matter was, to take revenge on those who wanted to destruct my talent and my writing and my time and my money.
And I found out very early in life, that small things cannot be changed or crashed. But to destroy huge matters was easy, like for example the terribly cynical Finance industry of Switzerland, solely in favour of the richest and most powerful Junk on this planet, would make good for some ignorance of media in Switzerland, Germany and Austria.
Simultaneously with Finances, other Nations and matters could be smashed easily, just by writing some truths and facts about the criminal energy behind all systems, States, powerful Elite and dull masses of folks.
Once started, it became very easy to get along with such texts - and never coming back on a phrase written. All the writers of literature made the mistake that they tried to be of highest literary style, until nothing of sense was left in between the lines of their useless writings. This was never an option of mine, ever more I discovered that whatever I wrote, always made highest sense and was of an IQ, some others on this planet could just dream about. - Proof: Whenever I lost a text by deletion of other reasons, I was never able to re-establish the texts on the same level of quality or intellect in contents.
How are the effects of saving and destroying our Reality?
It is not easy to bring any Effects of Savings in our present world, because the installed errors in the brains of 100 percent of folks on Earth are so gigantic that any new Theory of Truth would never have a chance.
It was my error to believe that my writing would be understood from the start. Empty brains, be they belonging to Editors, press, media, normal readers, are never made for understanding anything. They all want only see presented THEIR STUFF of Shit and nothing else. It is so in the written press and in Online business. All is like with Junk-Food: Never ever any person accustomed to junk food, would eat the food of first class hotels. This, I could witness throughout my life.
Same goes for intellect, spirit, philosophy, literature. High-up writing over the rest of junk, can only have a career and a chance in history, several decades having gone past. During times of Presence, there never was a chance and it was hard for me, to be - in spite of highest IQ - not aware of these facts - and to learn the heavy way that the impossible never could be made possible.
For destroying the world, it was easy - all of the 100 percent of masses did it - and so I did it too - Travelling around with cars and planes, using all resources and energy stuffs from all future generations, thus helping to destroy the planet. What else could I do: Be living in a black forest without a Penny?
But I wanted more: I wanted smash the systems of finances and money, I wanted the proof about wrong philosophies and theories, all the bluff of Dynamite-prize holders, all the bluff in high up arts and literature. And it was easy, because the greater the blindness of the Elite, in banking, economy, ecology, White House in Washington, dictatorship in all lands, the better I could give proof and show the dirt and the slime of reality in this rotten world.
It just had to be explained - and the tumbling down in the Orcus could be accelerated.
Saving or destroying? It was simple: Where saving had not the slightest chance, the program had to be changed: Don't let the agony of this rotten and stupid humanity be lasting too long. Just explain to the Elite and the great masses, in what misery they are living in, a misery they produced themselves by living in illusionary systems of smashing down the planet, of creating one bubble and crash after the other - more - the job of no mercy, in the interest of humanity, had not to be done. It was so easy that the will and intention for an active smashing of systems, would have been an illusion and certainly in vain.
The Music was in all times played by the dull and greedy Elite and their convincing the Masses, they are living in the "Best of all Worlds." Huxley and Orwell did it before - but they underestimated the dullness and the craze of humans and they never took in account the force given by the late explosion of population, of destruction in ecology, of smashing the finance systems by Wall Street greed, that had to do with religion too, because the greatest square-heads of neo-liberalism, in theory and practice, were Jews. Sorry to say - after Auschwitz of Hitler - but it is the simple truth. Anti-Semitism is in Israel.
Why writing in English and not in German?
My natural language is German. I may well dispose of 50000 words in writing German. And all my books were written in German, because it would never have made sense of writing anything in English.
But soon I found out, that forcing myself down of the 10000 words in English, made my theories more simple and more of getting understood by the stupid Elites and their even more stupid masses. And I would no longer use some "Faekal-Sprache" (language of faeces), because the publishers in the Net would not accept and like it.
But - why using Faeces-Language, anyway? Well, because the vanity, hypocrisy, greed and stupidity of science, media, politics, economics and destruction of ecology is so important that the best word to find for explaining the case, can only be a word of "Faeces". Whenever, in German, I replaced such a word, the text become too nice and thus untruthful.
But for English language, it seems that people, especially in cunning USA and dull England, always want real positive writing. Never they would accept too much of truth in the misery of their own existence, in a live they made themselves to be their world of misery.
Another reason for writing English: German language only Germans and Swiss understand. English can be understood in all nations of this Globe. And in the internet, anyway, only English was possible. Better some simplified English than a marvellous German. This was clear. And more: In German I was exactly informed, WHAT I was writing about. However, in English it could have been an advantage, not to be sure about terminologies - most of the time, this proved not to be a disadvantage.
And anyway: Because there was just ONE universal genius at times around the start of the 21st Century, the texts must have been in international language and since English wiped away some French, Spanish, Russian, Chinese etc., a writer of international affairs never had any chance of being heard, except for English language.
What would have been required to save our Globe?
And Final Words
The universal genius cannot come along and name precisely, WHO the hell was responsible for the final downfall of Humanity.
I guess there were millions of names to be put forward, the well-known idiots first, in philosophy, religion, economics and science certainly of highest importance. But without perpetrators in all fields of human life, without technologies for the masses, without Cash-systems with banks, insurance, stock exchange, all those Las Vegas systems of bets on rubbish, this mentioned, very fast-going but slow felt downfall in self-destruction of Homo non-sapiens, could never have been a program.
I think, the downfall can later on be described, after the decimation of humans down on some millions, if ever possible we let survive some millions, and it will be easy to tell.
But considering that I was able to predict the Crash of Finance systems in all details and to see - that all other "geniuses" were not even able to explain the facts, AFTER the crash was through - I guess - again - I must do it, alone, the required clearance of facts, ahead of times of the stupid ones, just now, with this report here.
Is there anything to be said in addition? Sure, I could write another book and another book and another book - in English or German, like the one with Title "Die Welt verliert sich im Sueden" ("The World vanishes in the South") - but now I am fed up of humans - as well as of their rotten systems.
Let them go dying slowly - now.
Rene Delavy - Berlin and Bournemouth