LUCY and ARDI - Craze about Anthropology
printLUCY and ARDI - Craze about Anthropology
'LUCY' and 'ARDI' - Anthropology and brain-science
Now, anthropologists have found a SKELETON of a Lady that heard on the name of "ARDI" and this species was 4 and a half million years old.
Before Ardi, they discovered some nice "Lucy" in the sky with diamonds - and all this was useful to find out that the theories of Darwin (who has stolen his theory from a third) were true: Humans looked once like some sort of Apes, but then they developed to the UPRIGHT WALK and used some TOOLS or play-stations - and all this is just great, say anthropologists and brain-scientists.
Indeed, it is always great when humans study about humans - instead of the fine principle about the survival of our species, of nature and animals and resources on our suffering planet - when marching always faster into our end-destiny.
Before talking about anthropology, go to the craze of
BRAIN-SCIENCE
Brain science is when 10000 scientists of the world use billions of Dollars to find out:
"Here in the brains, humans have such and such reactions on feelings and other processes. They have such kind of thoughts about in that area in the brains and there is the centre for criminality and behind function some streams for nice reflexes in sex. And look here, we found the centre for high spirit of Dynamite Prize Holders and here is the area for humans who have stayed greedy Apes on Wall Street."
But these very clever scientists will never find out if ever an individual functions in his network of higher intellect - completely upper the average. They will never know anything about the quality of thoughts, about a Hitler or Bush or Stalin and Mao and Greenspan, destroying the hopes of Humanity - and some chaps explaining why we all are going out of control and tumble to hell, due on basic stupidity of human brains in a chaos of figures and facts.
And here we have a parallel craze to the science of
ANTHROPOLOGY
I saw recently a scheme showing the periods of "Homo", "Australopithecus", "Ardipithecus", "Orrorin" and "Sahelanthropus".
Very funny, the idea that some lines over the whole period of evolution of homo non-sapiens started out of the nowhere and ended finally in the nowhere. Each under-species started in the void and ended there after some time - tell us these geniuses----
Behind this theory, there is no logic, for following reasons:
The END of a species or some kind of species can be true: All humans die some day. And so a tribe or a nation can die. And perhaps some kind or all of humans can die.
But never ever there was a God who dictated at the START: "Let's have some finished Adam and some finished Eve." - And so he could never say: "Have some finished Orrorin" or "Australopithecus" or "Homo sapiens".
The evolution of human mankind is a history of 13 billion of years. And this is only true, if the theory of the BIG BANG would be true at all (it isn't).
So, any new species must have come from the sexual act of some already existing animal.
And we all know: Animals were first living in the water and came slowly to Earth. And it did not look like GW Bush, Mao or Obama. It looked like a fish or a worm or a snake and developed towards an ape and finally in a Homo friedmaniensis, living around some Stock Exchanges in New York.
Again: A fish or some kind of rat - and later on, about 7 millions of years ago, it looked like an Ape.
And this ape developed and got on until this very day, because NOT ONE HUMAN would be living today, if not coming out of an endless and never broken evolution. It was NOT created by itself in a new line. And it was NOT created by a GOD according to theories of Catholics in Rome and Evangelists in Texas.
Therefore, the presentation of lines, where humans came out of the nowhere of empty space - and disappearing again to make place, without sex of a male and a female of an EXISTING species, to the next generation, almost alike to the former one, is a CRAZE, born in the brains of brain-scientologists - sorry - in the ones of anthropologists, naturally.
Conclusion
What ever they develop, these brains of scientists - when humans got out of any controls, under the spell of ape-brains - is not as true as you may believe:
- A Human is after some times no longer an ape, but it comes from the ape and behaves so
- A Brain is not really measurable on quality of thoughts, but still idiots measure "nothing"
- A Car is great to go from Paris to London, but it kills the future of your children
- An Electro car does not spoil the atmosphere, worse, it spoils the most expensive stuff ever
- A Plane is useful to fly to catastrophes in Sumatra - but destroys on flight our planet
- Brains of Wall Street bankers are great for profits - but it kills your savings
- Obama rescue packages are great for bluff, but not recoverable from future children taxes
- China is great in growth - and kills himself - by mass-laws and worthless U.S. bonds
Well, whatever comparison you take - by the end it's all a fake.
Almost nothing can guarantee the future of our children, when ecology collapses, economy gets completely out of control, banking replaces abstractedness of useful thinking and Homo sapiens bluffs about his huge capabilities when in fact going down to a line of decline, towards a Homo non-sapiens, by the end.
Some thoughts about eternity in time and endlessness in space would do, to bring relativity of Einstein on the level of brain-scientists and anthropologists.
But now I have exceeded your limits of thoughts and IQ - very sorry for that.
Rene Delavy - Berlin and Bournemouth
Author of "8 Steps of power in reflection" / "Theorem of Feasibility" / "Virtual Money" / "All scientific Nonsense of Homo sapiens"